No filter mesh
The gap between moving parts does the filtering. No cloth or mesh prone to clogging.
Both solutions separate solids from water without a filter mesh. Everything else follows from this concept: low speed, low power consumption, low rinse water consumption.
The gap between moving parts does the filtering. No cloth or mesh prone to clogging.
Neighbouring parts move against each other every revolution and keep the filtering gap open.
Slow rotation: wear-free structure, low vibration, low noise.
0.1 to 5.15 kW installed. Rinse water measured in litres per hour, not cubic metres.
The filtering surface is the calibrated gap between stacked rings or between rotating oval discs. Solids bridge across it, water passes through it.
On the screw press the free rings ride with the screw; on the separator the oval discs turn in sync. Either way the two surfaces forming the filtering gap never stop moving relative to each other.
The screw turns at 2 to 4 rpm. That keeps vibration and noise low and takes out most of the wear that makes a centrifuge a maintenance item.
Small motors, litres of rinse water, and a cake dry enough to shovel. The running cost is the argument for replacing a belt press or a decanter.
Specific consumption 0.01 to 0.1 kWh/kg DS: about one eighth of a belt press and one twentieth of a decanter centrifuge.